Smoothie Wars for Team Building: Corporate Applications

---

Ropes courses. Trust falls. Escape rooms. Most corporate team-building activities elicit groans from employees. They feel forced, artificial, disconnected from actual work.

Then there's Smoothie Wars. When PwC's Manchester office used it for their quarterly team development session, post-event survey results showed 94% rated it "genuinely valuable" (compared to 31% for previous escape room session).

Why? Because Smoothie Wars creates authentic decision-making scenarios that mirror workplace dynamics—resource allocation conflicts, strategic misalignment, communication under pressure, competitive vs. collaborative tensions—all observable in 45 minutes.

You don't need to manufacture "teachable moments." The game creates them naturally, and the debrief discussion writes itself.

This guide provides everything HR professionals, L&D teams, and managers need to deploy Smoothie Wars for team building: facilitator scripts, observation frameworks, debrief questions, and connection to workplace competencies. Whether you're running a 2-hour workshop or full-day off-site, this works.

Why Smoothie Wars Works for Team-Building

Let's establish the value proposition.

Observable Workplace-Relevant Behaviors

Traditional team-building (trust falls, ropes courses):

• Contrived scenarios disconnected from work
• Behaviors don't transfer ("We can catch each other falling backward, but how does that help us in the office?")

Smoothie Wars:

• Resource allocation conflicts: "We have £50 budget this turn—spend on short-term production or save for future investment?" (Mirrors real budget allocation meetings)
• Strategic disagreements: "I think we should pivot to Hotel, you think stay at Beach" (Mirrors strategy discussions)
• Information sharing: "Did you notice they bought exotics? What does that tell us?" (Mirrors competitive intelligence at work)
• Risk tolerance differences: "I want to play safe, you want risky play" (Mirrors risk management conversations)

Behaviors in-game directly translate to workplace contexts.

Genuine Engagement (Not Forced Fun)

Employees hate:

• Activities that feel like "team-building exercises" (transparent manipulation)
• Being told "This will be fun!" (creates resistance)

Employees accept:

• Actually enjoyable activities (Smoothie Wars is a good game regardless of learning objectives)
• Genuine challenge (strategic depth engages intellects)
• Voluntary participation (they're choosing to play well, not complying with forced activity)

Quote from participant: "I went in thinking, 'Ugh, another team-building thing.' But the game was actually fun, and the debrief discussion was the most honest conversation our team has had about how we make decisions. I'd do it again voluntarily."

Natural Debrief Topics

Forced debrief: "What did you learn from falling backward into Jim's arms?" (Employees struggle to articulate meaningful insights)

Smoothie Wars debrief: "Why did your team stay at Beach even when it became unprofitable?" (Team responds: "We'd committed to the strategy early, felt like pivoting was admitting failure, didn't want to look indecisive")

Facilitator: "Do we ever do that at work—stay committed to strategies that aren't working because we don't want to admit we should change course?"

Team: (Recognition dawns) "The Q3 campaign... we knew by Week 4 it wasn't hitting targets, but we kept funding it through Week 12 because we'd approved £50K..."

That's a breakthrough conversation. It emerged naturally from game experience, not forced by facilitator.

Facilitator Guide for Corporate Sessions

Step-by-step for running the session.

Pre-Game Framing (10 minutes)

Welcome and context:

"Today we're using Smoothie Wars for team development. It's a business strategy game—you'll compete to sell smoothies at different locations on a tropical island.

Why a game? Because it compresses weeks of business decisions into 45 minutes. You'll face resource allocation, competitive pressures, strategic trade-offs. We'll observe how you approach these challenges, then discuss parallels to our workplace.

Format: You'll play in teams of 3-4. Play to win—genuine competition creates authentic behavior. Afterward, we'll debrief as a full group."

Set expectations:

• Play seriously (half-hearted play produces no insights)
• Observe your own decision-making (you'll reflect on it later)
• Be ready to discuss honestly afterward

Observation Notes Template

While teams play, observe and note:

| Team | Strategic Approach | Communication Quality | Handling Disagreement | Risk Tolerance | Notes | |------|-------------------|---------------------|---------------------|----------------|-------| | Team A | Aggressive early, pivoted T4 | Good (discussed openly) | Voted, majority ruled | High | Strong strategic discussion | | Team B | Conservative throughout | Minimal (one person dominated) | Avoided conflict | Low | Communication issue visible | | Team C | No clear strategy | Chaotic (everyone talked over each other) | Unresolved disagreements | Mixed | Needs facilitation skills work |

Look for:

• Who emerges as leader? Is it positional authority or natural influence?
• How are decisions made? Consensus? Autocratic? Debate?
• How do they handle setbacks? (Fall behind Turn 3—do they adapt or blame?)
• Communication patterns? (Everyone contributes or some silent?)

Debrief Structure (30 minutes)

Phase 1: Experience sharing (5 min)

"Let's start with immediate reactions. How was that experience? Frustrating? Fun? Stressful?"

(Let teams share emotional responses)

Phase 2: Strategic decisions (10 min)

"Each team made different choices. Team A went Beach, Team B went Hotel. Why?"

(Teams explain reasoning, you facilitate comparison of approaches)

"What happened mid-game? Did strategies change?"

(Teams describe pivots, adaptations, or rigid commitment)

Phase 3: Workplace parallels (15 min)

Key questions:

1. "When you fell behind, how did your team respond? Do we ever respond that way at work when projects struggle?"

2. "How did you make decisions within your team? Voting? One person decided? Discussion? Is that how we make decisions at work? Should it be?"

3. "Team B stayed at Beach despite three competitors—sunk cost thinking (you'd already committed). Can anyone think of a work project where we did similar? Kept investing because we'd already invested, not because future returns justified it?"

4. "Some teams adapted Turn 4-5, others stuck to Turn 1 plan. In our work, are we flexible enough when conditions change?"

Let team members make connections—don't force them. The insights they articulate themselves are more powerful than what you tell them.

Variations for Specific Team Development Goals

Goal: Improve Communication

Variation: Team collaboration format (teams of 2 play as one player, must agree on every decision).

Forced communication: Can't make a move without discussing and agreeing.

Observable: Who persuades whom? How are disagreements resolved? Does one person dominate or genuinely collaborate?

Debrief focus: "How did you navigate disagreements? Did everyone's voice get heard?"

Goal: Assess Leadership Styles

Variation: Rotate designated "leader" each 2 turns. Leader makes final decision, but team can advise.

Observable: How does each person lead? Autocratic? Consultative? Consensus-seeking?

Debrief focus: "How did leadership styles differ? Which was most effective in the game? Which matches our workplace culture?"

Goal: Strategic Alignment

Variation: Give teams shared objective ("Team must collectively finish with £300+ total profit").

Forced alignment: Can't optimize individually—must coordinate strategies.

Observable: Do teams share information, coordinate positioning, or still compete internally?

Debrief focus: "How well did you align strategies? What prevented better coordination?"

Case Studies: 3 Companies That Used Smoothie Wars

Case Study #1: Tech Startup (24 employees)

Context: Team struggling with resource allocation debates (engineering vs. marketing budget)

Session: 2-hour workshop (4 games, debrief)

Observations:

• Engineering team (Team A) played conservatively, saved reserves (mirrored their real work style—risk-averse)
• Marketing team (Team B) spent aggressively, went broke Turn 5 (mirrored real tendency to overspend)

Debrief breakthrough: "You're playing the same patterns here as at work. Engineering, you keep £20 reserves in a game—too conservative, missing opportunities. Marketing, you spent everything and went broke—too aggressive, creating crises.

Can we find middle ground? Engineering takes slightly more risk, Marketing keeps slight reserves?"

Result: Real budget negotiation the following week referenced the game. "Let's not 'go broke Turn 5' with this campaign" became shorthand for overspending.

Case Study #2: Consulting Firm (18 consultants)

Context: Siloed teams, minimal cross-team collaboration

Session: Tournament format (best of 3 games, mixed teams each game)

Impact:

• Mixed teams forced cross-silo communication
• Consultants from different departments learned each other's thinking styles
• Post-tournament, consultants reported "I understand how Finance team thinks now—they're like Hotel District players (patient, long-term)"

Result: Improved cross-team project collaboration (anecdotal, but team leads noticed difference)

Case Study #3: NHS Trust (Management Team, 16 people)

Context: Decision-making took too long (consensus-seeking slowed everything)

Session: Smoothie Wars with 45-second shot clock per decision

Observations:

• Teams struggled with time pressure initially
• Learned to make "good enough" decisions quickly rather than seeking perfect slowly

Debrief: "In the game, you had 45 seconds. In real work, you often have days—yet decisions still take weeks. What if we set decision deadlines like the game's clock?"

Result: Team adopted 72-hour decision rule for non-critical choices (reducing meeting cycles)

ROI Discussion

Is this worth the cost?

Engagement Metrics vs. Alternatives

Smoothie Wars team-building session:

• Cost: £150 (6 game sets) + £200 facilitator time = £350 total
• Participant engagement: 94% rated "valuable"
• Lasting impact: 73% reported behavior changes 3 months later

Escape room team-building:

• Cost: £30/person × 24 people = £720 total
• Engagement: 62% rated "fun but not applicable to work"
• Lasting impact: 15% reported workplace insights

Ropes course:

• Cost: £40/person × 24 = £960
• Engagement: 41% (many uncomfortable with heights)
• Lasting impact: Minimal (trust falls don't transfer to office)

ROI: Smoothie Wars delivers comparable engagement at 40% of the cost, with higher workplace applicability.

Testimonials from HR/L&D Professionals

Claire Thompson, L&D Manager, Manchester Tech Company:

"We've tried everything—escape rooms, cooking classes, outdoor activities. Smoothie Wars is the first team-building activity where employees thanked me for organizing it. The strategic depth kept them engaged, the debrief produced genuine insights, and it cost half what we usually spend."

David Richardson, HR Director, Professional Services Firm:

"I was skeptical—'a board game for team building?' But the observable behaviors were gold. I saw who emerges as natural leader, who communicates well under pressure, who adapts vs. rigidly sticking to plan. Better assessment tool than personality tests."

Booking Information and Corporate Packages

Standard package (12-24 people):

• 6 Smoothie Wars game sets: £150 (bulk discount)
• Facilitator guide (PDF): Free download
• 2-hour session timeline: Included
• Certificate templates: Included

Premium package (24-48 people):

• 12 game sets: £280
• Professional facilitator (optional): £200 (2 hours)
• Custom debrief aligned to company goals: £100
• Total: £580 (or £380 if facilitating internally)

Contact: corporate@smoothiewars.com for bulk pricing, custom workshops

---

About the Author: Sarah Mitchell designs corporate training programs incorporating game-based learning. She's facilitated 30+ team-building sessions using strategic board games.

---

Transform your team development. Download our Corporate Facilitator Guide (free PDF) or book a custom workshop for your organization. Order corporate packages at bulk discount.