Smoothie Wars in the Classroom: Complete Teacher's Implementation Guide

---

You've read that Smoothie Wars teaches business strategy. You're intrigued by the supply-demand mechanics. You've maybe even played it yourself and thought, "My Year 9s would benefit from this." But then comes the practical question: how do I actually run this in a 50-minute period with 24 teenagers, limited tables, and no time for chaos?

I've worked with 200+ teachers implementing educational board games for classroom use, and I can tell you the difference between "great idea" and "actually works" comes down to practical planning. This guide provides everything you need to confidently bring Smoothie Wars into your classroom: timing breakdowns, printable resources, management strategies, assessment rubrics, and troubleshooting solutions. Let's make this work for your students.

Is Smoothie Wars Right for Your Class? (Quick Suitability Check)

Before diving into implementation, confirm it's appropriate for your context.

Age Ranges and Cognitive Readiness

Official recommendation: Ages 10+ (Year 5 and above)

Practical reality:

• Year 5–6 (ages 9–11): Can play with support—may need help with arithmetic and strategy discussion
• Year 7–9 (ages 11–14): Sweet spot—grasp rules quickly, engage strategically, benefit from learning
• Year 10–11 (GCSE): Excellent—connects directly to Business Studies/Economics curriculum
• Year 12–13 (A-Level): Works well for experiential learning, though some may find it "too simple" initially (debrief reveals depth)

Cognitive requirements:

• Basic arithmetic (addition, subtraction, multiplication by small numbers)
• Strategic thinking (planning 1–2 turns ahead)
• Reading comprehension (demand cards, rules reference)
• Social skills (negotiating shared board space)

Class Size Considerations

Optimal: 16–24 students (4–6 simultaneous games of 3–4 players each)

Workable:

• 12–15 students: 3–4 games
• 25–30 students: 6–8 games (requires more sets and tighter logistics)

Challenging:

• under 12 students: Can work but less dynamic (consider combining with another class)
• >30 students: Logistics become difficult unless you have ample space and multiple copies

Equipment needed per 4-student game: 1 Smoothie Wars set

So for 24 students: You'll need 6 sets ideally (schools can purchase classroom packs at educator discount)

Curriculum Fit Assessment

Does this align with what you're teaching?

Strong fit:

• Business Studies (supply-demand, competition, pricing, cash flow)
• Economics (market structures, equilibrium)
• Enterprise/Entrepreneurship
• Mathematics (financial literacy, data analysis)
• PSHE (decision-making, planning)

Moderate fit:

• Geography (market geography, resource distribution)
• History (economic history contexts)

Weak fit:

• Pure science subjects, languages, arts (unless doing cross-curricular projects)

What Age Is Smoothie Wars Suitable for in Schools?

Year 5 (age 9–10) through Year 13 (age 17–18), with primary suitability in Years 7–11. Younger students need more support; older students engage with greater strategic sophistication. Most teachers find Years 8–10 the perfect range.

Learning Objectives & Curriculum Links

What will students actually learn?

Primary Learning Objectives (Knowledge & Skills)

Knowledge objectives:

• Understand supply-demand dynamics in competitive markets
• Recognise how competition affects pricing and profitability
• Identify opportunity costs in resource allocation decisions
• Explain cash flow management principles

Skill objectives:

• Strategic planning (anticipating future turns, adapting to changes)
• Quantitative reasoning (calculating profit, comparing options)
• Decision-making under uncertainty (incomplete information, competitor actions)
• Collaborative discussion (if debriefing in groups)

UK National Curriculum Alignment

Key Stage 3 (Ages 11–14):

Citizenship:

• Economic understanding: how markets allocate resources
• Financial capability: managing money, budgeting

Mathematics:

• Ratio, proportion, percentages (calculating profit margins)
• Problem-solving (optimising decisions)

Key Stage 4 / GCSE Business Studies:

AQA Specification:

• 1.3 Putting a business idea into practice (cash flow, revenue, costs, profit)
• 1.5 Understanding the economic context (supply-demand, competition)
• 2.3 Making marketing decisions (pricing strategies)

Edexcel Specification:

• Theme 1: Investigating small business (competition, market research, pricing)
• Theme 2: Building a business (supply, demand, financial planning)

A-Level Economics:

All exam boards:

• Markets and market failure (supply-demand, equilibrium, elasticity)
• Business behavior (pricing strategies, competitive markets)
• The national and international economy (market structures)

Cross-Curricular Opportunities

Mathematics:

• Data handling: Collect gameplay data (profits per turn), create graphs, calculate averages
• Probability: Analyse demand card likelihoods
• Optimisation: What ingredient mix maximises profit?

PSHE:

• Financial capability: Budgeting, saving, investing
• Decision-making: Evaluating risks and trade-offs
• Resilience: Learning from failures/mistakes

Geography:

• Economic geography: How location affects business viability
• Resource distribution: Ingredient scarcity parallels

Pre-Lesson Preparation (Week Before)

Proper preparation prevents chaos.

Physical Setup Requirements

Per game (4 students):

• 1 table (standard classroom size, 4 chairs)
• Good lighting
• Enough space so students aren't bumping into adjacent games

Classroom arrangement:

• If you have moveable tables: arrange into clusters of 4
• If you have fixed rows: pair rows together, students face each other

Storage/organization:

• Open all game boxes the day before, check components are complete
• Pre-sort sets if components got mixed (label boxes "Game 1, Game 2, etc.")

Grouping Strategies

How do you assign students to games?

Option A: Ability mixing (recommended for first play)

• Mix high-achieving and struggling students
• Peer teaching happens naturally
• Prevents one group dominating while another struggles

Option B: Ability streaming (for repeated play or tournaments)

• Group similar-ability students
• Allows differentiated debrief (different questions for different groups)

Option C: Student choice

• Let students choose groups
• Risk: friendship groups may distract each other
• Benefit: social comfort can increase engagement

My recommendation: Start with teacher-assigned ability-mixed groups. Once students know the game, allow choice.

Pre-Teaching Essential Vocabulary

One week before game day: Introduce 5 key terms in regular lessons (don't say "for the game"—just teach them).

1. Supply: Amount of product available from sellers
2. Demand: Amount of product customers want to buy
3. Profit: Revenue minus costs
4. Competition: Multiple businesses selling similar products
5. Market: Place (physical or conceptual) where buyers and sellers meet

Day before game: Brief 2-minute refresher: "Remember these terms? Tomorrow we'll use them in an activity."

Students don't need deep understanding yet—just enough to recognise the words when they come up during play.

Parental Communication (If Needed)

For younger students (Year 5–7), consider sending a note home:

Sample parent letter:

Dear Parents,

This week in Business Studies, we're using a board game called Smoothie Wars to teach supply-demand and financial decision-making. Students will make strategic choices about where to position their business, what products to sell, and how to price competitively.

This hands-on approach helps students grasp abstract economic concepts through experience. It's fun, but it's also serious learning aligned with our curriculum.

If you'd like to know more, please feel free to contact me.

Kind regards, [Teacher name]

The 50-Minute Lesson Plan (Minute-by-Minute)

Here's the detailed timeline.

Minutes 0–10: Introduction & Vocabulary Activation

0–3 min: Hook & context

"Today we're playing Smoothie Wars—a strategy game about running a smoothie business. Your goal: make the most money. You'll decide where to set up shop, what ingredients to buy, what prices to charge. Sound easy? It's not—you're competing with others for customers."

3–5 min: Vocabulary activation

"Before we start, quick review: What's supply? [Call on student] What's demand? Competition?"

(Activate prior knowledge; students feel prepared)

5–10 min: Rules explanation

Keep it HIGH-LEVEL. Students will learn details through play.

"Each turn, you'll:

1. Pick a location (Beach, Town Centre, etc.)
2. Buy ingredients with your money
3. Make smoothies and set a price
4. Earn money based on customers and competition

If lots of sellers are at one location, you'll compete for customers—less profit for everyone. If you're alone, you'll earn more. Make sense?

We'll play 7 turns. Whoever has the most money at the end wins.

Any questions? [Answer 1–2 quick ones] Good. I'll circulate to help. Let's go."

Don't overexplain. Students learn best by starting and asking questions as they arise.

Minutes 10–40: Gameplay with Teacher Circulation

10–12 min: Setup & Turn 1

Students open boxes, sort components, start Turn 1. This will be slow—everyone's figuring it out.

Teacher role: Move between groups answering questions:

• "How much does this ingredient cost?" → "Check the card."
• "Where should I go?" → "Your choice—think about where competitors are."
• "What price should I charge?" → "Depends on your costs and competition."

12–40 min: Turns 2–7

Gameplay runs more smoothly now. Students gain confidence.

Teacher role shifts to observation:

What to observe and note:

• Which students grasp strategy quickly (early pivots, competitive pricing)
• Which groups have strong discussions ("We should avoid Beach, it's crowded")
• Which students struggle (random decisions, not tracking cash)
• Moments where economic concepts emerge ("It's not fair, there are too many of us here!")

Observations inform your debrief questions later.

Intervention guidelines:

• Intervene minimally for strategy (let them make mistakes—that's learning)
• Intervene for rules confusion (if a group stalls, clarify)
• Intervene for behavior (if competition gets unfriendly, remind about sportsmanship)

Managing pace:

• Groups will finish at different times (15–30 min range)
• Fast finishers: Give reflection question to discuss ("Why did the winner win?")
• Slow groups: "You have 5 more minutes to finish your game"

Minutes 40–50: Debrief & Reflection

This is THE MOST IMPORTANT part. Gameplay without debrief is entertainment, not education.

40–42 min: Transition & settle

"Games done—well played! Leave materials on tables, come sit in a circle [or stay at tables]. Let's talk about what happened."

42–50 min: Structured debrief

Use these questions in sequence:

1. Emotional check-in (1 min) "How was that? Stressful? Fun? Frustrating?" [Take 3–4 responses]

2. Pattern identification (3 min) "What happened at locations with lots of sellers?" [Expected: "We made less money," "prices dropped," "it was crowded"]

"What about locations with few sellers?" [Expected: "Made more money," "could charge higher prices"]

Prompt: "So more sellers at one place means...?" [Lead them to say: "less money per person"]

That's supply-side economics.

3. Pricing dynamics (3 min) "How did you decide what price to charge?" [Expected: "looked at competitors," "based on my costs," "guessed"]

"Did your prices change over time?" [Expected: "yes, I lowered when I wasn't selling," "I raised when I had premium ingredients"]

Prompt: "Why did prices tend to settle around £5–6?" [Lead them to: "That's where you could cover costs and still attract customers"]

That's market equilibrium.

4. Resource decisions (2 min) "What was hard about choosing which ingredients to buy?" [Expected: "Not having enough money," "Not knowing what would work," "Competitors bought stuff I wanted"]

That's resource allocation and opportunity cost.

5. Connect to formal economics (3 min) "Everything you experienced—crowding affecting profit, prices finding a level, trade-offs in buying—these are core economic principles. Let's give them names:

• When supply increases (more sellers), prices fall and individual profits drop. That's the supply curve.
• When you're deciding what to buy, you're making opportunity cost choices—what you give up to get something else.
• When prices settled into a range, that's market equilibrium—the price where supply meets demand.

You didn't just play a game. You experienced real economic dynamics. Cool, right?"

What teacher does during each phase:

• Introduction: Be energetic, build excitement
• Gameplay: Observe, take notes, minimal intervention
• Debrief: Facilitate, ask questions, connect to theory

How Long Does Smoothie Wars Take in a Classroom Setting?

Typically 30–35 minutes for gameplay (Turns 1–7) with 4-player groups, plus 10 minutes setup and 15 minutes debrief = 55-60 minutes total for first play. Subsequent plays reduce to 40–45 minutes as students learn faster. A 50-minute period is tight but workable if you're efficient.

Classroom Management Strategies

How do you prevent chaos?

Managing Competitive Intensity

Some students get VERY competitive. This is good (engagement!) but can turn negative.

Set expectations upfront: "This is a competition—you're trying to win. That's the point. But it's also a learning experience. Be competitive, but be respectful. No gloating, no mean comments."

Intervene if needed: "I love the competitive energy, but let's keep it friendly. Celebrate your successes quietly."

Post-game: "Who won at your table? [Acknowledge] Well done. But let's remember everyone played well and learned something."

Handling Disputes and Rule Questions

Disputes happen: "She took my location!" "He cheated!"

Response protocol:

1. Pause the game briefly: "Hold on, let's sort this out."
2. Ask each side: "What happened from your perspective?"
3. Check rules: "Here's what the rules say..." (reference rulebook or your judgment)
4. Make a ruling: "Here's what we'll do: [decision]. Everyone okay with that? Good, keep playing."
5. Move on quickly: Don't let disputes derail the whole lesson

For minor rule misunderstandings: "That's not quite right—here's how it works." Correct and continue.

For genuine rule ambiguity: "Good question—I'm not 100% sure. Let's rule it this way for now, and I'll check the official rules after class."

Keeping Non-Playing Roles Engaged (If Odd Numbers)

If you have 23 students and games of 4, you'll have 3 groups of 4, 1 group of 3, and 2 students left over.

Options for "extra" students:

Option 1: Observer/analyst role "You're going to observe this game and take notes. Watch what strategies win and lose. You'll present your analysis during debrief."

Option 2: Rotate in "You'll join this group for Turns 4–7, replacing a player who'll become the observer."

Option 3: Pair as a team "You two will play as one player together—collaborate on decisions."

Option 4: Assistant teacher "Help me circulate and answer other students' questions."

Noise Level Management

Games get loud (excited discussions, celebrations, groans). This is engagement, not misbehavior—but it can't drown out instructions.

Strategies:

1. Set noise expectations: "You can talk at your tables—that's collaboration and strategy. But keep it table-level volume, not shouting across the room."

2. Signal for attention: Hands up, lights flicker, countdown ("3...2...1...eyes on me")—whatever works in your classroom

3. Praise quiet groups: "I love how Table 3 is discussing strategy without disturbing others."

4. Redirect loudly: If one group gets too loud: walk over, quiet presence, "Little bit quieter please," move on.

How Do You Manage Board Games in a Classroom?

Set clear behavioral expectations (respect components, stay seated unless necessary, talk at reasonable volume), circulate constantly to monitor and assist, use timers to keep games moving, and have a signal to get everyone's attention quickly. Most importantly: debrief afterward to transform play into learning.

Observation & Facilitation Guide

What should you actually be doing during gameplay?

What to Look For During Gameplay

Strategic thinking indicators:

• Students discussing options before deciding
• Changing strategy mid-game (adapting to competition)
• Tracking opponent moves (competitive intelligence)

Struggling indicators:

• Random decisions without rationale
• Not tracking cash/running out of money
• Frustration or disengagement

Misconceptions emerging:

• "The game is totally luck" (missing strategic elements)
• "Whoever starts at Beach always wins" (missing pivot opportunities)
• "Expensive ingredients are always better" (missing cost-benefit analysis)

Note these—you'll address in debrief.

Intervention vs. Letting Students Struggle

Err on the side of letting them struggle.

Intervene when:

• Rules confusion stops play
• A student is completely lost and disengaging
• Conflict escalates beyond productive competition

Don't intervene when:

• Students make strategic mistakes (let them learn consequences)
• Someone's losing (that's valuable learning)
• Discussion gets heated but respectful (that's engagement)

Guiding questions instead of answers:

• Student asks "Where should I go?" → You ask: "Where are your competitors? Where might be less crowded?"
• Student asks "Should I buy dragonfruit?" → You ask: "How much does it cost? How much extra could you charge? Would that be profitable?"

Recording Observations for Assessment

Carry a clipboard with a simple grid:

| Student Name | Strategic Thinking | Adaptability | Collaboration | Notes | |--------------|-------------------|-------------|---------------|-------| | Alex | ✓✓ | ✓ | ✓ | Pivoted Turn 4, strong | | Jamie | ✓ | ✓ | ✓✓ | Great team discussions | | Sam | — | ✓ | ✓ | Struggled with strategy |

Symbols:

• ✓✓ = Strong
• ✓ = Satisfactory
• — = Needs support

Quick notes during play, formal write-up after class.

The Critical Debrief: Turning Play into Learning

The debrief is where entertainment becomes education.

Essential Debrief Questions (With Expected Answers)

I've given you the basic structure above. Here are 10 more questions to choose from based on what you observed:

Economic concepts:

1. "Why did profit drop when more sellers joined a location?" [Supply increase → lower individual profit]
2. "How did demand cards affect your decisions?" [Guided location choice, pricing]
3. "What's opportunity cost? Give an example from the game." [What you gave up to choose something else]

Strategic decisions: 4. "Who changed locations during the game? Why?" [Responding to competition] 5. "How did you decide what price to charge?" [Based on costs, competition, demand] 6. "Did anyone run out of money? What happened?" [Over-spending, cash flow crisis]

Transferring to real-world: 7. "How is this like a real business on the high street?" [Competition, pricing, customer preferences] 8. "What surprised you about running a business?" [Harder than expected, need to adapt, etc.]

Metacognitive reflection: 9. "What would you do differently if you played again?" [Better cash management, earlier pivots] 10. "What skill did you practice today?" [Strategic thinking, planning, adapting]

Connecting Gameplay to Business Concepts

Always make the bridge explicit:

"When you experienced [gameplay moment], that was [business concept]."

Examples:

• "When four of you competed at Beach, that's what economists call a saturated market."
• "When you couldn't afford ingredients because you overspent, that's a cash flow problem businesses face."
• "When you charged £8 but sold nothing, you priced above what customers valued—that's missing your market."

Facilitating Student-Led Insights

Instead of telling, ask and let students articulate:

Teacher: "What pattern did you notice about crowded locations?" Student: "Everyone made less money." Teacher: "Why do you think that happens?" Student: "Because we're sharing customers?" Teacher: "Exactly—sharing a customer pool. That's a core economic principle. When supply increases relative to demand, individual profit drops. You just explained supply-side economics."

Students take ownership of the learning when they articulate insights themselves.

Common Misconceptions to Address

Misconception 1: "The game is just luck." Address: "Yes, there's some luck (demand cards, dice), but did the same person win every game? If it's pure luck, results would be completely random. Skill matters over time."

Misconception 2: "Beach is the best location." Address: "Beach is profitable early, but what happened by Turn 4 when everyone was there? Profit dropped, right? Best location depends on when and how many competitors are there."

Misconception 3: "Expensive ingredients are always better." Address: "Better if they increase your profit. But if dragonfruit costs £12 and only adds £2 to your revenue, is that worth it? Always calculate cost vs. benefit."

Assessment & Evaluation

How do you grade this?

Formative Assessment During Play

What you're assessing: Process skills (strategic thinking, adaptability, collaboration)

How: Observation notes using rubric (see earlier section)

Weight: Counts toward participation/effort grade

Summative Assessment Options

Option 1: Reflection essay (300–500 words)

Prompt: "Describe your strategy in Smoothie Wars. What worked well? What would you change? Connect at least two decisions you made to business concepts we've studied."

Assessment criteria:

• Accuracy of business concepts
• Depth of reflection
• Evidence of strategic thinking
• Written communication quality

Option 2: Group presentation (5 minutes)

"Present your group's strategy and results. Explain key decisions and their outcomes using business terminology."

Option 3: Application test (written)

"You're opening a new café on the high street where three already exist. Using concepts from Smoothie Wars, explain: a) What challenges will you face? b) How will you price competitively? c) What could you do to differentiate yourself?"

Assesses transfer of learning to new contexts.

Assessment Rubric Templates

Rubric 1: Reflection Essay

| Criterion | Emerging (1-2) | Developing (3-4) | Secure (5-6) | Mastery (7-8) | |-----------|---------------|-----------------|-------------|--------------| | Business concepts used | 0–1 concepts | 2 concepts | 3 concepts | 4+ concepts accurately applied | | Depth of reflection | Surface ("I lost") | Some analysis | Good analysis | Deep, critical analysis | | Strategic thinking | Random decisions | Some strategy | Clear strategy | Sophisticated, adaptive strategy | | Writing quality | Unclear | Adequate | Clear | Excellent communication |

Rubric 2: Observation (Formative)

(Provided earlier—strategic thinking, adaptability, collaboration)

How Do You Assess Learning from Educational Games?

Combine process assessment (observation during play) with product assessment (post-game reflection or test). Process shows how students think; product shows what they learned. Balance the two for comprehensive evaluation. Rubrics help maintain objectivity and clarity.

Extension Activities & Follow-Up Lessons

How do you build on this?

Written Analysis Assignments

Assignment 1: Profit & Loss Statement

"Create a profit & loss statement for your Smoothie Wars business. Show turn-by-turn revenue, costs, and profit. Graph your profit over time. Analyze: which turns were most/least profitable and why?"

Assignment 2: Competitor Analysis

"Choose one opponent from your game. Analyze their strategy: Where did they position? What pricing did they use? What worked for them? What didn't? If you played them again, how would you counter their strategy?"

Assignment 3: Real-World Connection

"Find a real business in your area (coffee shop, grocery store, etc.). Analyze their competitive environment using concepts from Smoothie Wars: How many competitors do they face? How do they differentiate? What pricing strategy do they use?"

Business Plan Creation Based on Game Insights

Project: "Create a business plan for a real smoothie business in your town."

Requirements:

• Market research (who are your customers? competitors?)
• Location analysis (where would you set up? why?)
• Pricing strategy (based on costs and competition)
• Financial projections (expected revenue and profit)
• Contingency plans (what if competitors arrive?)

Connection: "Use lessons from Smoothie Wars to inform your plan. What did the game teach you about competition, pricing, cash flow?"

Debate Topics Sparked by Gameplay

Debate 1: "Is competition good or bad for businesses?"

Debate 2: "Should businesses charge the highest price possible, or focus on affordability?"

Debate 3: "Is it better to be first to a market (first-mover advantage) or to learn from others' mistakes (fast-follower)?"

Students will have strong opinions based on gameplay experience.

Mathematics Extension

Activity: "Probability analysis of demand cards"

"Calculate the probability of each location having high demand. If there are 10 demand cards and 3 show Beach as high-demand, what's the probability Beach is high-demand in any given turn? Use this to inform strategy."

Activity: "ROI calculations for ingredients"

"Calculate return on investment for each ingredient type. If bananas cost £2 and add £3 revenue (ROI = 50%), and dragonfruit costs £12 and adds £8 revenue (ROI = -33%), which is more efficient? When does dragonfruit become worth it?"

Differentiation Strategies

How do you support all learners?

Supporting Struggling Students

Provide scaffolds:

• Simplified reference card (decision flowchart)
• Calculator for profit calculations
• Partner with a stronger student ("buddying")
• Fewer turns (play 5 turns instead of 7)

Modified objectives:

• Focus on cash flow management only (don't worry about optimal strategy)
• Aim for "staying in the black" (positive profit), not winning

Challenging Advanced Students

Add complexity:

• Play with advanced rules (event cards, trading, loans)
• Set specific challenges ("Win without using exotics," "Win from Marina")
• Assign them to teach struggling students

Higher-order questions:

• "If this game had an 8th turn, what would you do?"
• "Design a new location with unique rules. How would it affect strategy?"
• "Write an article analyzing the game's economic accuracy."

Accommodations for SEND Students

Dyslexia:

• Minimize reading (explain cards verbally)
• Color-code components
• Allow verbal rather than written reflection

Dyscalculia:

• Provide calculator
• Pre-calculate ingredient costs (reference sheet)
• Partner with strong maths student

ADHD:

• Shorter play (5 turns)
• Frequent breaks between turns
• Fidget tool allowed during others' turns
• Active role (being "banker" who manages components)

Autism:

• Predictable structure (clear rules, explicit expectations)
• Reduce sensory overload (quiet corner for their game)
• Social story beforehand ("We'll play a game. Here's what will happen...")

Multi-Lesson Sequence Options

How does this fit into a unit?

3-Lesson Unit Plan

Lesson 1: Play Smoothie Wars

• Gameplay + debrief (as described above)
• Homework: Reflection essay

Lesson 2: Formalise Economics Concepts

• Review gameplay experiences
• Teach supply-demand curves formally, using gameplay data
• Practice problems applying concepts

Lesson 3: Real-World Application

• Case study analysis (real business)
• Apply supply-demand concepts learned
• Assessment

5-Lesson Integrated Unit with Assessments

Lesson 1: Introduction to Markets

• Pre-assessment (what do you know about supply-demand?)
• Play Smoothie Wars
• Initial debrief

Lesson 2: Supply-Demand Theory

• Build supply curves from gameplay data
• Build demand curves
• Teach equilibrium formally

Lesson 3: Market Structures

• Monopoly vs. competition
• Replay Smoothie Wars with 2-player (monopoly-like) vs. 4-player (competition)
• Compare results

Lesson 4: Real-World Analysis

• Local business case studies
• Students apply supply-demand analysis
• Group presentations

Lesson 5: Summative Assessment

• Written test + project presentation
• Reflection on learning progression

Practical Logistics

Nuts and bolts.

Budget and Purchasing

Individual game: £25–30 RRP

Classroom set (6 games): £150–180 (often discounted for educators—check website)

School budget lines:

• Teaching resources
• Curriculum development
• Enrichment materials

Funding sources:

• School budget allocation
• Department funds
• PTA donation
• Education grants (check local authority)

Cost per student (one-time): £6–8 for classroom set used with 24 students

Compared to:

• Textbooks: £15–25 per student annually
• Software licenses: £10–20 per student annually
• Smoothie Wars: One-time purchase, reusable indefinitely

Storage and Organisation

Storage:

• Keep games in original boxes (labeled "Game 1, Game 2," etc.)
• Store in cupboard or shelf accessible to you (not students—prevents component loss)

Organization tips:

• Check components termly (confirm nothing missing)
• Use plastic bags for small components (prevent loss)
• Laminate rule sheets (withstand handling)

Setup/pack-away:

• Pre-lesson: Have games ready on tables when students arrive (saves 5 minutes)
• Post-lesson: Allocate 5 minutes for students to pack up ("Check all components are in your box")

Dealing with Lost Pieces

Prevention:

• Clear pack-away protocol ("Count your components before closing the box")
• Student ownership ("This is your group's game for the period—look after it")

When pieces go missing:

• Contact publisher for replacement components (many offer free/cheap replacements)
• Use generic substitutes (colored buttons, tokens from other games)
• Combine incomplete sets (2 sets missing pieces = 1 complete set + 1 spare)

Troubleshooting Common Challenges

Anticipated problems and solutions.

"Students Finish at Different Times"

Cause: Some groups play faster than others (experience, decision speed, fewer players)

Solutions:

Option 1: Flexible activity for early finishers

• Reflection discussion: "While we wait for others, discuss: Why did you win/lose?"
• Observer role: "Watch another game in progress. What strategies do you see?"
• Extension task: "Calculate your profit margin each turn. Graph it."

Option 2: Adjust timing

• Set a timer: "All groups must finish by [time]. If you're on Turn 5, speed up slightly."

Option 3: Embrace it

• Early finishers help struggling groups (peer teaching)

"One Group Is Clearly Not Engaged"

Diagnosis: Are they confused (rules issue) or bored (motivation issue)?

If confused:

• Pause their game: "Let me watch one turn and help you out."
• Clarify rules
• Get them back on track

If bored:

• Add stakes: "Winning group gets [small reward—house points, certificate, etc.]"
• Check your initial grouping (friendship group distraction?)
• Sometimes one disengaged student affects whole group—move them to another group or give them observer role

"Confusion Over Rules Is Derailing Learning"

Prevention:

• Keep initial rules explanation simple (details emerge during play)
• Have rule reference cards at each table
• Circulate actively to catch confusion early

If happening:

• Pause all groups briefly
• Clarify the confusing rule for everyone at once
• Demonstrate with an example
• Resume play

"Student Says 'This Is Just a Game, Not Real Business'"

Response: "You're right that it's simplified—real businesses are more complex. But the core dynamics are real:

• Real businesses compete for customers (just like locations in the game)
• Real businesses make pricing decisions based on costs and competition (just like you did)
• Real businesses manage cash flow (just like you had to)

The game compresses these into 45 minutes so you can experience them and learn the principles. Those principles apply to real business."

Follow-up: "Can anyone think of a real business example where competition affected pricing?" [Lead discussion connecting game to reality]

Real Teacher Case Studies

Three implementation examples.

Case Study 1: Urban Comprehensive Secondary School (Year 9 Business Studies)

Context: 28 students, mixed ability, 50-minute lesson

Implementation:

• Used 7 game sets (groups of 4)
• Pre-taught vocabulary previous lesson
• Gameplay took 35 minutes (rushed slightly)
• Debrief was 10 minutes (too short in retrospect)

Results:

• High engagement (teacher noted "best lesson of term for engagement")
• Some groups finished much earlier than others (timing challenge)
• Students grasped supply-demand intuitively
• Follow-up assessment showed 78% could apply concepts to new scenarios

Teacher reflection: "I'd allocate 60 minutes next time, or split across two lessons. The debrief deserved more time—that's where the learning crystallizes."

Case Study 2: Rural Academy (Year 7 Introduction to Economics)

Context: 18 students, younger age (11-12), mixed prior knowledge

Implementation:

• 5 games (groups of 3-4)
• Played simplified version (5 turns instead of 7, no exotic ingredients)
• Gameplay: 25 minutes
• Debrief: 15 minutes
• Follow-up lesson: built supply-demand graphs from their data

Results:

• Very successful—students loved it
• Some struggled with arithmetic (solved by allowing calculators)
• Vocabulary retention strong 2 weeks later
• Parents commented positively ("My child explained supply-demand to me!")

Teacher reflection: "The simplification was crucial for Year 7. Full rules would've overwhelmed them. Adapting for age made all the difference."

Case Study 3: Independent School (A-Level Economics Enrichment)

Context: 12 students, high-achieving, 90-minute period

Implementation:

• 3 games (groups of 4)
• Played twice (different groups second time)
• Between games: analyzed first game's data mathematically
• Debrief included game theory discussion (Nash equilibrium)

Results:

• Students initially skeptical ("Isn't this too simple for A-Level?")
• Changed minds after debrief connected to exam concepts
• Second game showed dramatically improved strategic play (learning transfer visible)
• Wrote excellent analytical essays connecting game to syllabus

Teacher reflection: "A-Level students need the theoretical challenge. Don't just play—analyze deeply. That's where value lies for advanced students."

Free Downloadable Resources

Available at educator resource page:

1. 50-minute lesson plan (detailed, step-by-step)
2. Student reflection worksheet (structured prompts)
3. Observation recording sheet (assessment grid)
4. Parent information letter (editable template)
5. Assessment rubrics (three versions: observation, essay, test)
6. Supply-demand curve building activity (using gameplay data)
7. Debrief question bank (20 questions organized by difficulty)
8. Extension activity ideas (homework, projects, maths links)

All resources UK curriculum-aligned, editable, free for educators.

---

Frequently Asked Questions

What age is Smoothie Wars suitable for in schools? Officially 10+ (Year 5 and up), but most successful in Years 7–11 (ages 11–16). Year 5–6 can play with support. Year 12–13 can engage with sophisticated analysis during debrief. Sweet spot is Years 8–10 for Business Studies and Economics.

How long does Smoothie Wars take in a classroom setting? 30–40 minutes for gameplay, plus 10 minutes setup and 15 minutes debrief = 55–65 minutes total for first play. A 50-minute period is tight but workable if you're efficient. Subsequent plays take 45–50 minutes total as students learn faster.

How do you manage board games in a classroom? Set clear expectations (respect components, reasonable volume, stay seated unless necessary), circulate constantly to observe and assist, use a signal (countdown, raised hand) to regain attention, and provide clear timing boundaries. Most importantly: debrief afterward to transform play into structured learning.

How do you assess learning from educational games? Combine process assessment (observation rubric during play—strategic thinking, adaptability, collaboration) with product assessment (post-game reflection essay, application test, or project). This captures both how students think during play and what they learned from it. Use rubrics for objectivity.

---

About the Author: Sarah Mitchell is an education specialist who has trained over 200 UK teachers in game-based pedagogy and experiential learning. She develops curriculum-aligned resources and works with schools to implement innovative teaching tools.

---

Ready to implement Smoothie Wars in your classroom? Order classroom sets with educator discount or download our free complete teacher resource pack including lesson plans, assessment rubrics, and printable worksheets.