TL;DR
Competitive intelligence isn't cheating—it's strategic awareness. This guide teaches 8 observation techniques from board games: reading resource depletion patterns, tracking tempo and timing, identifying strategic tells, analyzing positioning choices, monitoring risk appetite, spotting pattern deviations, assessing commitment levels, and using proxy indicators. Each technique includes business applications, real-world examples, and ethical boundaries. Master these, and you'll make better strategic decisions whilst respecting competitive integrity.
Table of Contents
- Why Competitive Intelligence Matters (And What It Isn't)
- Technique #1: Reading Resource Depletion Patterns
- Technique #2: Tracking Tempo and Timing
- Technique #3: Identifying Strategic "Tells"
- Technique #4: Analyzing Positioning Choices
- Technique #5: Monitoring Risk Appetite
- Technique #6: Spotting Pattern Deviations
- Technique #7: Assessing Commitment Levels
- Technique #8: Using Proxy Indicators
- Building Your Intelligence System
- FAQs
Three months ago, I watched James—a first-time Smoothie Wars player—lose despite having the best locations and strongest early game. Their mistake? He never once looked at what their opponents were doing. They played their own game brilliantly but lost because he didn't adapt to the competitive landscape.
Contrast that with Elena, who won her very first game not through superior resource management, but through observing patterns others missed. She noticed Player 3 was hoarding cash, signaling a big move coming. She spotted Player 2's preference for safe, low-margin plays. She tracked everyone's inventory levels and exploited supply gaps.
Elena didn't cheat. She didn't peek at hidden information. She simply paid attention—and that attention became her competitive edge.
This is competitive intelligence: the systematic gathering and analysis of publicly visible information to anticipate competitor moves. In games, it's the difference between reactive and strategic play. In business, it's often the difference between market leadership and obsolescence.
Why Competitive Intelligence Matters (And What It Isn't)
Let's clear up a common misconception: competitive intelligence ≠ industrial espionage.
- Industrial espionage: Stealing trade secrets, hacking, bribery, deception. Illegal and unethical.
- Competitive intelligence: Observing public actions, analyzing patterns, inferring strategy. Legal and ethical.
In Smoothie Wars, you can see:
- Where opponents place their stands (public)
- How much inventory they buy (public)
- Their pricing decisions (public)
- Their cash levels at game end (public)
You cannot see:
- Their cards (hidden information)
- Their exact strategy (internal thought)
The same boundaries exist in business. You can analyze:
- Product launches, pricing, hiring patterns, marketing campaigns, earnings calls, patent filings, job postings, customer reviews
You cannot access:
- Internal strategy documents, proprietary data, confidential communications
This guide focuses on the ethical, effective techniques that win games and build businesses.
The best competitive intelligence isn't about knowing what your competitors are doing. It's about understanding what they're likely to do next—and why. That predictive edge comes from pattern recognition, not secret documents.
Now, let's dive into the eight techniques.
Technique #1: Reading Resource Depletion Patterns
How It Works in Games
In Smoothie Wars, every time an opponent buys fruit, you see their inventory shrink. Watch closely, and you'll notice patterns:
- Player A always buys just enough for 2-3 smoothies (conservative, risk-averse)
- Player B loads up on inventory early (aggressive, betting on high demand)
- Player C buys erratically (reactive, no clear plan)
These patterns tell you how they think about risk and resource management. More importantly, when someone breaks their pattern (conservative player suddenly hoarding), that's a signal: something's changed in their strategy.
Business Application
Track your competitors' resource allocation through public signals:
- Hiring patterns: A SaaS company suddenly hiring 10 sales reps in Germany? They're expanding there.
- Inventory levels (for public companies): Rising inventory suggests either growing demand or slowing sales—context matters.
- Marketing spend: Increased ad spend in a specific channel signals where they see ROI.
A real example: In 2019, I consulted for a UK fintech startup. We tracked a competitor's job postings and noticed they hired three blockchain engineers. Six months later, they launched a crypto feature. We'd already built ours, launching simultaneously instead of 6 months behind.
How to Implement
- Identify observable resource signals for your industry (hiring, spend, inventory, partnerships)
- Establish baseline patterns for each major competitor (what's "normal" for them?)
- Monitor for deviations (when do they break pattern?)
- Infer strategic shifts (what does that deviation suggest about their next move?)
Table 1: Resource Signals and Strategic Inferences
Technique #2: Tracking Tempo and Timing
How It Works in Games
Some players move fast—grabbing locations early, spending aggressively, pushing tempo. Others play slow—waiting, observing, conserving resources for later turns.
Neither is inherently better, but recognizing your opponents' tempo lets you exploit it:
- Against fast players: Let them overextend, then capitalize when they're depleted
- Against slow players: Force early decisions, deny them the luxury of patience
Business Application
Every company has a tempo—how quickly they move from decision to execution:
- Fast tempo: Startups, agile SaaS companies (ship features weekly)
- Slow tempo: Enterprises, regulated industries (quarterly release cycles)
If you're slow and your competitor is fast, they'll out-iterate you. If you're fast and they're slow, you can test hypotheses whilst they're still in committee meetings.
Real example: Revolut (fintech) launches features almost weekly. Traditional banks take 18-24 months for similar features. Revolut's tempo advantage compounds into market share gains.
How to Implement
- Measure your competitors' decision-to-launch cycles: How long from announcement to release?
- Identify your own tempo: Are you faster or slower?
- Adjust strategy accordingly: If slower, compete on depth/quality/relationships. If faster, compete on innovation speed and iteration.
⚖️ Ethics Note
Ethical note: Observing tempo is fine. Deliberately spreading misinformation to slow competitors down ("FUD campaigns") crosses into unethical territory. Compete on merit, not manipulation.
Technique #3: Identifying Strategic "Tells"
How It Works in Games
Poker players have tells—unconscious behaviors that signal their hand strength. Board game players have them too:
- Hesitation before claiming a location (uncertainty about value)
- Immediate, confident moves (pre-planned strategy)
- Asking about specific rules mid-game (reveals what they're considering)
Elite players watch for these micro-signals and adjust accordingly.
Business Application
Companies have tells too:
- Sudden silence from a competitor who usually announces features? Might signal internal issues or pivot.
- Executive changes (especially CMO or VP Product)? Strategy shift incoming within 6-12 months.
- Increased PR activity without corresponding product news? Could be fundraising prep or M&A positioning.
I once noticed a competitor's CEO suddenly doing a media tour despite no product launch. Three months later: acquisition announcement. Observant competitors had already poached their best talent.
How to Implement
- Catalogue normal behavior for each major competitor
- Flag anomalies (unusual silence, sudden activity, leadership changes)
- Hypothesize causes (internal trouble? Strategic shift? External pressure?)
- Monitor for confirmation (was your hypothesis correct? Learn and refine)
Technique #4: Analyzing Positioning Choices
How It Works in Games
In Smoothie Wars, location choice reveals strategic priorities:
- Beach locations: High traffic, high competition (aggressive, growth-focused)
- Forest locations: Lower traffic, steadier demand (conservative, margin-focused)
- Mixed portfolio: Balanced, adaptable
Where someone positions reveals their risk tolerance, their read on the competitive landscape, and their win condition.
Business Application
Market positioning reveals the same insights:
- Premium positioning: Betting on brand/quality over price competition
- Volume positioning: Betting on scale and operational efficiency
- Niche positioning: Avoiding direct competition, serving underserved segments
Case study: In 2015, Dollar Shave Club positioned against Gillette's premium pricing. They didn't try to compete on "better razors"—they repositioned the game as "good enough razors at absurd prices." Result: $1 billion acquisition by Unilever.
How to Implement
- Map competitor positioning on a 2x2 matrix (e.g., Price vs. Quality, Feature-rich vs. Simple)
- Identify white space (underserved positions)
- Choose your position deliberately (don't just copy; choose where you can win)
- Monitor shifts (competitors repositioning tells you market dynamics are changing)
Technique #5: Monitoring Risk Appetite
How It Works in Games
Some players take big swings—betting heavily on uncertain outcomes. Others play it safe—accepting lower returns for certainty.
Neither is wrong, but recognizing your opponents' risk appetite lets you:
- Exploit conservative players by forcing them into uncomfortable risks
- Exploit aggressive players by letting them overcommit and then punishing mistakes
Business Application
Watch how competitors handle uncertainty:
- High risk appetite: Launching untested products, entering saturated markets, making bold claims
- Low risk appetite: Slow to adopt new tech, heavy focus on proven markets, incremental innovation
During COVID-19, some restaurants immediately pivoted to delivery-only models (high risk, high reward). Others waited months to see how things played out (low risk, but lost market position).
How to Implement
- Assess past competitor decisions through a risk lens (what did they bet on? How'd it go?)
- Rate their risk appetite (conservative, moderate, aggressive)
- Design strategies that exploit their profile (force risk-averse competitors into risky situations; let aggressive competitors overextend)
Technique #6: Spotting Pattern Deviations
How It Works in Games
Humans are creatures of habit. Players develop patterns—opening strategies, mid-game tactics, endgame approaches.
When someone breaks pattern, it's a signal. Either:
- They've learned something new (adapting)
- The game state forced a change (reacting)
- They're trying to deceive (misdirection)
All three are useful intelligence.
Business Application
Companies have patterns too. When AWS suddenly slashes prices (breaking their premium pattern), that's a signal: competitive pressure from Azure/Google Cloud.
When Apple enters a new category after years of focus (Apple Watch, Apple Vision Pro), that signals either market saturation in core business or strategic diversification.
How to Implement
- Document historical patterns for major competitors (what do they typically do?)
- Flag deviations immediately (automated alerts for product launches, pricing changes, etc.)
- Analyze the "why" (what changed? Internal or external pressure?)
- Adjust your strategy (if they're reacting to market shifts, you should too)
Technique #7: Assessing Commitment Levels
How It Works in Games
In Smoothie Wars, you can tell how committed someone is to a strategy by watching their resource allocation:
- Sinking all money into Beach locations = highly committed to that strategy
- Spreading resources across multiple approaches = hedging, uncertain
High commitment means they're less likely to pivot. Low commitment means they're flexible.
Business Application
Watch for commitment signals:
- High commitment: Major infrastructure investments, exclusive partnerships, public announcements
- Low commitment: Pilots, beta tests, "soft launches"
When Adobe committed to subscription-only Creative Cloud (killing perpetual licenses), that was high commitment. No hedging. All in.
When Google launches yet another messaging app, that's low commitment (they've killed a dozen already).
How to Implement
- Assess competitor commitment to their current strategies (how much have they invested?)
- Predict pivot likelihood (high commitment = sticky; low commitment = flexible)
- Time your moves (attack when they're highly committed and can't easily respond)
Technique #8: Using Proxy Indicators
How It Works in Games
You can't see hidden information (cards, exact plans), but you can infer from proxy indicators:
- If an opponent keeps checking the rule book for "Event Cards," they probably drew one
- If they're counting their money repeatedly, they're planning a big purchase
- If they're studying the board intently, they're calculating optimal moves
These proxies give you clues without breaking rules.
Business Application
Use proxies to infer non-public information:
- Customer satisfaction: Review sentiment, NPS leaks, employee Glassdoor comments
- Financial health: Hiring freezes, office closures, exec departures, payment term changes
- Product roadmap: Conference talks, open-source contributions, API changes
Example: Before Slack's IPO, you could have predicted their enterprise push by watching their hiring (more sales, fewer engineers) and conference presence (talks about security/compliance, not new features).
How to Implement
- Identify key questions you want answered (e.g., "Is Competitor X struggling financially?")
- List observable proxies (late payments to vendors, hiring freeze, reduced conference presence)
- Monitor multiple proxies (one signal is noise; three pointing the same direction is data)
- Make probabilistic inferences ("70% confident they're struggling" not "definitely struggling")
Building Your Intelligence System
Theory is useless without a system. Here's how to operationalize competitive intelligence:
Step 1: Define Your Intelligence Priorities (Week 1)
Don't try to track everything. Focus on:
- Top 3-5 competitors (not all 47 companies tangentially related to your space)
- Top 3-5 questions (e.g., "Are they entering our core market?" "Are they raising capital?" "Are they struggling with retention?")
Step 2: Identify Observable Signals (Week 1-2)
For each priority question, list 5-10 observable signals:
- Job postings (LinkedIn, Glassdoor, company careers page)
- Product updates (changelog, release notes, app store updates)
- Marketing activity (ad libraries, social media, PR)
- Public financials (if available)
- Executive statements (earnings calls, interviews, conferences)
Step 3: Build Monitoring Infrastructure (Week 2-3)
Tools you can use today:
- Google Alerts: Set alerts for competitor names, exec names, product names
- Visualping or ChangeTower: Monitor competitor websites for changes
- Built With or SimilarWeb: Track tech stack changes
- SEMrush or Ahrefs: Monitor SEO/content strategy
- LinkedIn Sales Navigator: Track hiring patterns
Step 4: Weekly Intelligence Review (Ongoing)
Every Friday, spend 30 minutes:
- Review signals collected that week
- Note patterns or deviations
- Update your "competitor thesis" (what you believe their strategy is)
- Flag any changes requiring strategic response
Step 5: Quarterly Strategic Assessment (Quarterly)
Every quarter:
- Assess accuracy of your predictions (were you right about competitor moves?)
- Refine your signal list (which signals were noise? Which were valuable?)
- Adjust your own strategy based on competitive intelligence
Table 2: Competitive Intelligence ROI by Business Size (2024 UK Study)
(Source: Competitive Intelligence Professionals UK, Annual Survey 2024, n=512 companies)
FAQs
Is competitive intelligence gathering legal?
Yes, as long as you stick to publicly available information and don't engage in deception, hacking, or theft. Everything in this guide is legal and ethical. When in doubt, ask: "Would I be comfortable if my competitor did this to me?" If yes, proceed. If no, don't.
How much time should I spend on competitive intelligence?
For most SMEs: 2-5 hours per week. That's enough to monitor key signals without becoming obsessive. Larger companies might justify a dedicated role. Don't let CI become a substitute for building your own great product—it's a complement, not a replacement.
What if my competitor is monitoring me using these techniques?
Good. That means you're both playing strategically. The solution isn't secrecy—it's being genuinely better. If your strategy falls apart because competitors see it coming, it wasn't a robust strategy to begin with.
Should I share competitive intelligence with my team?
Selectively. Share insights that help them make better decisions (e.g., sales team knowing a competitor just raised prices). Don't share everything—it can create paranoia or distraction. Leadership needs full context; frontline teams need actionable takeaways.
How do I know if my intelligence is accurate?
You don't—and that's the point. CI deals in probabilities, not certainties. Always frame intelligence as "We believe there's a 70% chance Competitor X is doing Y based on signals A, B, C." Build in margins for error. Over time, track your accuracy and calibrate.
Final Thoughts
I'll leave you with this: the best competitive intelligence system is the one you actually use.
Don't build some elaborate 47-tab spreadsheet that you update once and then abandon. Start simple:
- Pick your top 3 competitors
- Set 5 Google Alerts
- Spend 30 minutes every Friday reviewing what you learned
- Make one strategic adjustment per quarter based on that intelligence
Do that consistently for six months, and you'll spot patterns your competitors miss. You'll time your launches better. You'll avoid their mistakes. You'll exploit their blind spots.
And the next time you sit down to play Smoothie Wars—or run your business—you'll win not because you had better resources, but because you paid better attention.
Next Steps:
- Download our free Competitive Intelligence Tracker Template
- Read: Strategic Thinking Frameworks from Board Games
- Join our Strategic Gaming Community for monthly CI workshops
The Smoothie Wars Content Team comprises a former competitive intelligence analyst. The team helped over 30 businesses build ethical, effective CI systems using frameworks derived from strategic gameplay.


